|
Post by Michael on Oct 7, 2023 15:00:05 GMT
ANCIENT SPPOOKSOur esteemed member Gerry has done great work decoding Ancients Spooks and his site is worth a lot of boosting. Personally, I think Gerry is worthy of his own section / board. However, until he is honoured in such a way, I thought this might be a good place to ask general questions and discuss the entirety of this work
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 7, 2023 15:04:21 GMT
To get the ball rolling:
Gerry, I get the coding (and you no doubt have answered this somewhere) but how do you think these texts are passed / decoded by our Overlords. It would seem to be a large undertaking for most of them to understand. Do they have whole roles assigned to the storage and passing of the relevant knowledge to the relevant people Much like the Royals and the ladies with their finishing schools? And, how do they ensure hat the knowledge doesn't slip out.
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Oct 8, 2023 10:21:19 GMT
Michael, thanks for your interest in my work, but please don't open a special section for that. Just posting in the history section should be enough.
About how the texts are passed or decoded: I'd guess that pretty much all spooks and lesser spooklings have always learned everything directly from other spooks. And that's how they also learned the encryptions: Someone who knew it sat down with them in a classroom and showed them, like "this phrase here really means that" etc. One indication is that Talmud students are instructed to always study the texts in pairs. Once they had learned the general system through the big texts, they could then also use these or similar encryptions in short letters or conversations that might be intercepted. Of course, most of the time they did not talk like that or write like that. And even in ancient times, the legions of lesser idiot spooklings probably never understood these texts. You need a very broad vocabulary, and to build it up you need to be a privileged person who can sit down and read most of the time. And among the upper-crust spook aristocrats, many probably weren't too skilled in that encryption either, because they were too privileged & lazy to study. So texts written by "Caesar" were probably not really written by Caesar. But all upper-crust spooks would've been taught the general concepts. One indication that the lesser idiot spooklings don't know the contents of these texts is that the authors discuss in them how to deceive the lesser idiot spooklings. Also, many among the lower ranks are probably hooked on Judaism or Mormonism or somesuch, so they're probably not shown texts where the upper-level spooks explain this as mockery. And today, now that there's digitally encrypted long-distance communication, very few even among the upper-level spooks probably learn these encryptions very well. They have a handful of signs & markers which they use, and that's that. The old texts are mostly kept for tradition's sake and educational purposes.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 8, 2023 11:43:10 GMT
Gerry A. Understood B. Yes, makes perfect sense. That is what the public school system in the UK was / is for, get a grounding in the Classics (Latin and Greek) then send the clever ones off to Oxford and Cambridge and than pick from where that over laps with those of noble breeding on the Venn diagram. Interestingly, I thought I would wiki Venn diagram before posting and look at the image that they use as an example, I wonder whether this is another little joke, pointing us back but not too far? Venn diagram showing the uppercase glyphs shared by the Greek, Latin, and Russian alphabets Again, interestingly (though probably only to someone as ignorant as I am) wiki on Hebrew is saying It is an offshoot of the Imperial Aramaic alphabet, which flourished during the Achaemenid Empire and which itself derives from the Phoenician alphabet. So they aren't denying that, at least, the alphabet came from Phoenicia, though later on down the page they do somewhat muddy the waters on that.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 11, 2023 11:50:05 GMT
jroachgp I assume the Israelis know this (unless they are losing their own language). Any ideas what they think of it, is it not an obvious pointer to fakery from within their own ranks?
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 11, 2023 13:36:22 GMT
@jroachgpp Sorry, I assumed your assertion of Hamas meaning violent thievery being a direct reference was based on your knowledge of Hebrew, thanks for the clarification.
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Oct 11, 2023 13:59:49 GMT
My guess is that most Israelis are as clueless about the fakery as people in other countries. The spook percentage may be higher there, maybe like in the USA perhaps, or even higher, but it's still a minority.
Puns like with Hamas would not be seen as proof of anything. "Hamas" is always spelled with an Aleph, "violence" is never spelled like that. Someone might say "hey look dude, Hamas is almost spelled like violence, and they're so violent", but it'd be seen as a funny coincidence. People who write in abjad scripts are used to word similarities popping up everywhere. They're trained to read around them, otherwise they'd never get a single sentence straight.
I mean, in English, "shoe" is pronounced exactly as "shew" meaning "show". But how many English speakers smell the fakery when virtually all articles about school shootings picture shoes? Like, zero percent? Even the truthers on CTTF discussing the shoes as hoax markers didn't see the similarity. I overlooked it myself at first, and thought it was some Hebrew pun.
And about that gematria website, it's the usual mysticist fear porn, complete with Satanism & aliens. Every fake is sold as real, only the evil Satanist government did it.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 12, 2023 11:37:02 GMT
Gerry Thanks for your clarification. very useful. I would say that in English shoe is not pronounced show. Link, below, to both British and American English pronunciations. So I think there is something else here. Pun on feat to feat (achievement)? www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/shoe_1But yes, I noticed it in the JO Cox event and though it strange, though it is a pity that Miles never covered that one. Here are Jo Cox's shoes
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Oct 12, 2023 15:10:22 GMT
Oh, my bad. I meant the old spelling of "show" as "shew". That looks like it's pronounced like "shoe", but apparently it was pronounced like modern "show", except in Eastern dialects, where it's really pronounced like "shoe". Still, I'd say it gets pretty close in some British dialects.
It's usually never exact homophones anyway. Another English example was the "number forty-seven", well known from Miles' papers. I suggested that it's a "number for deceivin". Not the same pronunciation, but pretty close if you lay on a thick Southern US accent. But very few English speakers notice these things, so Israelis wouldn't either.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 12, 2023 16:26:11 GMT
Gerry Ah, I get it. Looks to me like a visual pun when spelt like that. I can hear 47 as as fordeceiving in maybe Latin. This is all reminding me of The Two Ronnies Four Candles sketch, which even if it was meant to be some kind of in joke for spooks was still very funny.
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Oct 16, 2023 8:44:54 GMT
Hi everyone, I'll use this thread to announce a new update on the Ancient-Spooks site, with 2 partly decrypted Talmud chapters:
- The first is the Shabbath chapter, and it's really about manufacturing wars, confirming everything we know from Miles' work! I've already decrypted 6 sections, but one army related topic takes up the biggest space for the spooks. We know it from Miles too, but I bet you won't guess what it is.
- The second is Maaser Sheni, about disguised informants, aka lesser idiot spooklings. I've decrypted only a little bit, but you can already see they're held in pretty low regard by the actual spook aristocrats.
- And for those of you who've always hated them forrin-lookin squigglies, there's now a new widget (in the upper-left corner) where you can fold all glyphs & vocabulary away, for smooth reading in good old English! Yay!!!
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Oct 19, 2023 10:38:06 GMT
Stupendous work. Especially funny the ending lines of the Sabbath, cautioning the Gaylords. I'm guessing the "robust mockery" refers to more blatant hoaxes. Mockery and hoax seem to be interchangeable words. It's amazing how relevant these rules are even in modern technological times, and how this all coalesces so well with the Miles-theory that the CIA was created as the modern worldwide Clearinghouse for hoax operations, and overseeing the spooks, lesser spooks and gullible idiots involved. The ending lines are just the part where I had gotten to, I thought it was a good ending. But it's not the end of it. I'm currently decrypting the following chapters. And behold, the gaylord fokker smut, which already took up the entire sections 5 and 6, is even continued through all of sections 7 and 8. Section 7 of the official text lists 39 "household works" which are forbidden on Sabbath. And all have to do with "rubbing" or "pounding" or "knocking" or "sprinkling". It's totally crazy, but apparently for the elites the most important problem in a war is that the gaylords get caught too often while entangled with the fresh young troopers! I admit it was funny for a while. But now I'm thankful that with section 9 the smut-fest seems to be over... 😖 The "robust mockery" was just my headline. The 1st paragraph says you cannot kindle a war with "talk" & "speech". The next paragraph then says also not with "pretense" & "mockery". But in reality, they use pretense & mockery for wars all the time. So I took it they mean "not just any pretense & mockery", only if it's very "valid". Like, better-quality hoaxes. The "valid" pun is ybš ≈ yṣb, not a very good one, so I could be wrong. Generally, all synonym words are more or less interchangeable. I just go with what the dictionaries list, and only the modern ones include words like "hoax". And yeah, the hoaxes seem to have been the main occupation of secret agents since ancient times, millennia before the CIA. There is a special Talmud chapter about hoaxes, but I'm not very far into that just yet.
|
|
|
Post by erwin on Oct 23, 2023 18:42:19 GMT
Thanks for the updates! I read it in the weekend. It is amazing to have these small snippets of actual insider spook talk. The Maaser Sheni informant subject was especially interesting, because it is seemingly another category to them, which I did not consider as such before. The gay-lord specifics were also susprising. So it required special mention even back then. If this gayness is an ever increasing occurence in their lineage, then it should be even more common in 2023. Unless inbreeding problems have already forced a "re-arrangement" in the ranks.
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Nov 24, 2023 20:00:18 GMT
Ancient Spooks UpdateHi everyone, I've published a new intermediary version of my Talmud decryptions: - New chapter Terumot about hoaxes. Not much about the actual hoaxes yet, but many insights on how the aristocrats classify people, and who's allowed to do what.
- The Shabbat chapter about war, now updated with more gay sex in the army and propaganda rules.
- The Peah chapter about official nobility, now updated with rules on how they fake that one country is always ruled by one noble, while it's really otherwise.
- (For those who haven't read them yet, there's also the Maaser Sheni and Berakhot chapters, this time without updates.)
There's also new features & improvements for dealing with these lengthy texts: - A new "Minimal" setting in the Pun Config panel, which turns off everything except the decrypted English translation, so you can read it like a book.
- In this translation block, all the insertion brackets & question marks are now omitted, for smoother reading. (To see them, switch to "Intermediate".)
- All lengthy decryptions like the Talmud texts now have section headings, for a better structuring of all the madness.
|
|
|
Post by erwin on Nov 28, 2023 21:45:31 GMT
Thanks for the updates! Shabbat chapter about war - It is very surprising how detailed they were seemingly discussing the gay behavior of gay lords during a war. They were obviously having major trouble just doing the job at hand, without getting sidetracked. New chapter Terumot about hoaxes - It makes one wonder what it would practically mean when something is not an accepted hoax.
|
|