Population Control and Eugenics

I don't believe that population control is evil. I think it happens to be true that the Earth is overpopulated. I don't support the idea of killing anyone but I think that population control aimed at reducing world population is a good idea.

Look at the West’s birth rate, we’re going to decline anyway. “They” don’t need to do anything. Except stress us out about it so we’ll buy more useless crap from the cloth merchants and shipping companies.

I am on the fence with this one.

To me the fake pandemic was about money for the most part, some people dying from a vaccine is a bonus, but i do not think it was a goal.

I know one person (in Israel) that died after the second shot. He was in his late sixties, pretty fit, but had rheuma and took pills for that (instead of stop eating grains and vegetable oils), so an underlying condition.

Other than that, most people seem as bad as they always were. (once you start eating raw meat you start to see even better how unhealthy everybody is).

Is there any evidence the puny's are actually out to get us?

Is This The REAL Reason They Want The Farmers Land?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTefoRWEuto

I think no one has mentioned that population decline in the west has demographic imperatives. We have to understand that in the US we have huge medicaid and medicare and aid for the elderly. Financial committments that are so popular that it is almost death alone that can reduce the price tag. The US is borrowing constantly pushing back the inevitable cuts, but that is equivalent to pushing the real costs onto future generations. Its insane, and now we are seeing inflation, a kind of tax that elites can consider just a reduction of profits while countries and people get squeezed to death.

Overpopulation is often framed as a global problem, but its also highly variable by region. Take africa, they have the space and resources of sudan and much more but we see populations climb way faster than the west and no realistic way to feed them as this growth curve climbs, much less allow them to take part in an energy rich economy. And we see corruption and failure to distribute often with gov interference. Whole cultures there would almost rather see people die than change the way they produce food or run the state. Any change has to come at great personal cost, often armed revolution.

We see immigration, even what we might term immigration pressure, as conditions in one region become a reason to migrate to the west and take the place and jobs of those children which were not born locally. I see this is a boon for any phonecian, a cheaper, downtrodden, captured and controllable workforce that can perform much of what is known as unskilled labor. We also see automation at the high end of skilled labor, realistic ways to reduce the staffing cost to produce the same old level or even to expand. These are pressures that have to be balanced by anybody "planning" anything or its like Miles says it will collapse on thier head. Reducing new births in the west is fine if immigration is maintained.

I don't think we can realistically predict the future, but as cheaper immigrant labor and a demographic decline shape the scene, any potential huge "die off" is absorbable. The key is that they avoid blame for it. So how covid was treated in some cases seemingly lethal to people, it removes those elderly entitled to expensive aid and guarantees financial incentives. As the financial system chugs onward to an inevitable correction of boom and bust, its just necessary for a phoney to keep thier head above water and plan to come out on top. I don't think they would notice too much if a cyber attack brought starvation to thier own fellow citizens, they just have to get to that boat full of gold and survive in a more old fashion way somewhere the starving cannot reach them. And that is to assume the starving will even understand their plight enough to target those really responsible. If they can't walk the streets without a digital scannable ID, it would raise the costs to fight ANY system.

I see the most likely scenario as financial collapse. That could be mild or severe, it could be set off by criminality or a move to gov issued crypto that becomes mandatory. It could be triggered by a cyber attack if it was big and broad enough, or it could happen if China cuts off our supply of chips coming out of taiwan. It could happen if supply chains or energy is disrupted or become too expensive, it could be triggered by a natural disaster like a Coronal mass ejection. Real outlier threats exist but are too unlikely to speculate as to when they would happen. I feel like planning to CAUSE a mass dieoff is not even that difficult, but how to surf through it safely is where most of the planning might take place. That is demonstrated by Covidianism, it was control of the media and certain health authorities worldwide to the level where people were convinced an extincion level event was occuring. It would be safer to fake it, but if something really does happen the planning for it is similiar and cannot necessarily predict all outcomes. Thus we see the bunkers in New Zealand, people with clever ways of getting wealth out of the the US [its not easy] even bothering to renounce citizenship would be only for those really planned ahead.

Engagement by the my fellow US citizens on this issue is so low, so polluted. Even at CTTF, literally we witnessed disinfo designed to fake out people who already believed there was a mass die off agenda. What I witnessed there was hardly informed and developed discussion on the topic. We have lol posting patents, but so far I see no reason these patents are any bombshell of intricate planning for the covid hoaxes. Discussion here is also not engaged, for instance where are you Garlic soup? I've now dropped my opinion as you requested, as have several others, are you just going to post once and then disengage? That is allowed but in the future I doubt I'll be too psyched to spend a half hour typing. No idea if anybody is even gonna read this. . .

Respectfully I disagree, money borrowing is the best way to frame it. It is so complicated, more full of intentional deception than any other subject, I agree, but to bring it in a comment forum does not allow me to discuss the fed, the sale of treasury bills, and servicing the national debt and repercussions to the world economy. I'll check out mythfighter.com briefly.

found a problem already: mythfighter.com/2009/09/07/introduction/
"Then, to “pay off” the “debt,” the government simply debits your T-security account and credits your checking account. Thus, the government could pay off all its debt tomorrow, simply by debiting all T-security accounts and crediting the “lenders'” checking accounts."