Post by Daniel Archer on Dec 24, 2022 9:31:11 GMT
New paper:
Why I Don't Believe the Fusion Announcement
Quote:" Fusion and fission are opposite processes,
and you cannot store energy in both directions. It is a contradiction in terms. When the Sun fuses, the
energy “created” isn't released from some stored architecture. It isn't “created” at all. In short, the Sun
takes in charge coming to it from the Galactic Core, recycling that charge through its body using spin,
pulling it in at the poles and releasing it on the equator. As that charge passes through its body,
everything in the Sun is spun up. Not just the Sun as a whole, but all particles in the Sun. As they are
spun up, they stack on more spins, with photons being spun up into leptons and baryons. Those
particles then collide and arrange in further spin-ups, giving us all the elements. But to do that requires
an energy loss. Some of the energy of the charge field is stored in those charge paths, so there is
actually less energy coming out of the Sun than going in. Or, energy is conserved, as it always is, but
available charge energy decreases, since some of it is tied up in the nucleus. So in this sense, the Sun
as a whole is an under-unity device. Fusion only seems to be over-unity since we measure the huge
energy coming out of the Sun and ignore the huge energy coming in"
---
For my 2 cents, the sun is more of a chemical powerhouse, it fuses elements only to a limited degree and probably only at/in the surface where pressure is highest. The core of the sun would not be really dense nor hot (at least not millions of degrees).
Why I Don't Believe the Fusion Announcement
Quote:" Fusion and fission are opposite processes,
and you cannot store energy in both directions. It is a contradiction in terms. When the Sun fuses, the
energy “created” isn't released from some stored architecture. It isn't “created” at all. In short, the Sun
takes in charge coming to it from the Galactic Core, recycling that charge through its body using spin,
pulling it in at the poles and releasing it on the equator. As that charge passes through its body,
everything in the Sun is spun up. Not just the Sun as a whole, but all particles in the Sun. As they are
spun up, they stack on more spins, with photons being spun up into leptons and baryons. Those
particles then collide and arrange in further spin-ups, giving us all the elements. But to do that requires
an energy loss. Some of the energy of the charge field is stored in those charge paths, so there is
actually less energy coming out of the Sun than going in. Or, energy is conserved, as it always is, but
available charge energy decreases, since some of it is tied up in the nucleus. So in this sense, the Sun
as a whole is an under-unity device. Fusion only seems to be over-unity since we measure the huge
energy coming out of the Sun and ignore the huge energy coming in"
---
For my 2 cents, the sun is more of a chemical powerhouse, it fuses elements only to a limited degree and probably only at/in the surface where pressure is highest. The core of the sun would not be really dense nor hot (at least not millions of degrees).
