Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Feb 9, 2023 17:05:42 GMT
Hi all, I'm about to publish a new Talmud analysis, but before that I wanted to make a short survey here: I spent the last years mainly doing these word-for-word decryptions. Personally, I think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. I mean, we can actually decrypt the unpublished secret meanings out of texts from thousands of years ago, how cool is that! However, I got the impression that almost no one ever reads my analyses. Because in the discussions about the spooks, people still seem to take old texts mostly at face value. So, my question is: Can I somehow make my decryption analyses more readable? Has any of you ever read such an "interlinear" analysis, where the translations are printed on top of the foreign word, on my site or on any other? Would you recommend any such website as a good example? Or do you know a particularly bad example, where you found it was too troublesome, and then left it alone? My own ideas right now are that I should maybe polish up the translation summaries a little, and make the interlinear block collapsible. That way, people who can't be bothered with the foreign stuff can collapse it all, and could at least read the summaries as a coherent text. Would that make anyone here read at least some of it? Or do you have any better ideas to make the whole thing more clicky and user-friendly? Thanks for any suggestions.
|
|
|
Post by Daniel Archer on Feb 10, 2023 8:28:38 GMT
Yes a summary or just an intro to why it is important/juicy. Maybe some insight/backstory before you get to the meat.
My jewish friend bothered with the talmud, reading a lot of the books and books about the books, but i never did, so if someone is not familiar it is really hard to get into.
|
|
doormanthe3rd
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 60
|
Post by doormanthe3rd on Feb 11, 2023 8:03:20 GMT
You are a giant Gerry. I can't find anything to improve on your translation presentations at this time. I notice the link you embedded above directs me to this page we are on. I'm wondering if it was meant to direct to a page on your site. "My entire adult life, I had to read news about about strange" only needs one "about". "These may seem bold claims, but unless most fake “alternative” history websites," I think you want to say "but UNLIKE most fake “alternative” history websites.
|
|
|
Post by Davey on Feb 12, 2023 1:35:05 GMT
For what it's worth, Gerry, I have read nearly everything on your site with great enjoyment. That's coming from zero expertise in the subject. Just pure enjoyment of language.
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Feb 20, 2023 20:00:16 GMT
Thank you all for the feedback and the encouragement. I've corrected the link and the typos, though there's probably 100s more. I take it then that the interlinear blocks are OK the way they are for the moment, and I'll write some better introductions instead.
@archer, if you still have contact to your friend, you may want to try and nudge him gently away from the Talmud. Even with encryption, I can still see value in the surface text of many religious works, and even hints of earlier pre-spook versions, but I cannot see any of that in the Talmudic surface text. It really seems to be just arbitrary stuff strung together for the right encryption words. Hope he didn't bury himself in that.
|
|
lol
Really good at convincing us he’s not a bot
Posts: 144
|
Post by lol on Feb 22, 2023 16:49:49 GMT
I checked out a few of Gerry's decryptions, but I think they're only partial decryptions. Maybe the hidden rulers really did encrypt bibles etc, so their fellow neophyte rulers could read them in a different way than the common people would. I haven't given that deep thought. I mean, like, would hidden rulers really need to communicate in this way with each other? And are there any decrypted contents of such bibles or other books that greatly tend to prove that such encrypted communication has been essential for the successful functioning of the hidden rulership? But, assuming that encryption was/is essential to them, which I'm highly skeptical of, the reason I think your decryptions are incomplete is because I consider the common understanding of the New Testament to be a good guide for society, and the New Testament was created to bring back a proper understanding of the Old Testament, the reading of which had become corrupted over the centuries by corrupt religious authorities. I consider it possible, but not likely, that the Bible was encrypted by hidden rulers, but even if it was, I believe angels tricked the hidden rulers into encrypting it in a way that would get their own (the angels') message across to the common people. I think there are still serious misunderstandings in conventional interpretation of the Bible, but not that serious. Hell was not originally in the Bible, and it's gradually being removed from the New Testament as scholars come to understand the words better. Savior means Role Model or Example. God means caring angels. Trinity comes from pagan beliefs which came from the time when the Saturn Configuration was observed to be dominant in the sky above Earth's northern axis or north pole, with Venus in front of Saturn and Mars in front of Venus. So there were 3 spheres lined up that looked like concentric circles. Saturn was thought to be God the Father, Venus the Mother, and Mars the only begotten Son. Venus later was thought to be Spirit, or Holy Spirit, when it strayed from the alignment. Miles has a theory that people originally came from the Saturn moon, Titan, and he has criticized Velikovsky and Saturn theorists. Saturn theorists rejected much of Velikovsky and they have a much better developed theory than Miles' idea, IMO. I've studied it all since 1969.
PS, Science and Republican Government seem to have originated in the 1400s with Cardinal Nicolas of Cusa, Italy, and his circle of priest-friends, who used ideas in the New Testament as the basis for these efforts to improve conditions for the common people. Republican governments were supposed to be government of, by and for the common people. And science was supposed to make sound, reliable findings of physical facts to also improve conditions for the common people. The Larouche movement promoted such claims and I think they're largely right about that, even if they're wrong about the characters of the main founding fathers. My brother talked to Larouche once about our Dad's experiences in Burma during WW2. I had read previously that Larouche was in India with the OSS during the war, but my brother found out that he was also in Burma after the main airfield was taken from the Japanese. The OSS got a lot of good intelligence from local people that they were able to pass on to the allied troops in Burma to help defeat the Japanese. I doubt if Larouche was a spook or agent of the ruling class. He was probably deceived to some extent by the ruling class and thus had an incomplete understanding of the ruling class.
|
|
|
Post by Davey on May 8, 2023 14:27:55 GMT
Hey Gerry, and others, I just stumbled across this person - Mauro Biglino via this short video www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk35cGeKAdQ entitled "The Bible Does Not Talk About God?". Are you familiar with him? He seems to be working along similar lines to you. This doesn't really contribute to your request for suggestions on how to improve the prose of your interpretations, but does lend weight to the thought that the Bible is more like a coded manual by which the rulers maintain their power.
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on May 10, 2023 15:04:27 GMT
About that Biglino video: That looks like the usual utter & total garbage, peddling ancient aliens as a new ersatz religion.
They lead with a few well-known but pointless observations: Yes, we don't know the authors of the Bible, the script omits vowels, there's ambiguities, and contradictions.
So what? ALL religious texts have unknown authors, imperfect scripts, ambiguities, and contradictions! That's the norm. Nothing special about it. At all.
Now the observation of those ambiguous meanings would be somewhat valuable as a first step. Like, that "God" is written exactly like "rulers", and "universe" like "perversion". That's what got me started on my journey. But to decrypt the true meaning, it's not enough to substitute just one or two words. You need to check ALL words for possible substitution. And besides identical spellings, you also have to consider somewhat similar spellings, even anagrams.
But the Biglino guys stop right there at the first step. They say: Okay, we interpreted these handful of words for "God" as the names of rulers. But hey, "let's pretend all the rest is still 100% accurate". They literally say that. They substitute God away for some ruler, but all the divine wonders, all the magicking around, that's still 100% true. And since modern scientific people know magic doesn't exist, that can only mean one thing... it's... ALIENS!1 FROM OUTER SPACE OMG!1!!! 😂
I stopped watching there, but I'm sure people who love their Ancient Aliens™ will have hours of good fun, and will read their Bible in a whole new light. As for myself, I stopped watching & reading all analyses about ancient texts altogether a long time ago, because NONE ever even hinted at the word-for-word encryptions of entire texts, which I found only by ignoring them all. 😉
|
|
|
Post by Davey on May 11, 2023 13:11:16 GMT
Thanks Gerry, I figured you could set me straight.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 7, 2023 13:39:18 GMT
@gerrry I think the option to collapse inter linear translations is a great idea, if I have put it on to listen to with a reader when I am out for a walk they get in the way and make it difficult to listen to. I love your analysis and want it there to study but having a summary as a jumping off point that can be read / listened to in about half an hour would be a great thing. Which I think is about a 10 page Miles pdf, so 7,000 to 10,000 words. It could even be done as a podcast or YT video, though I have reservations about dancing with the devil of big tech platforms. This article has some ideas on how to convert written blogs etc to audio which might be an interesting option. geekflare.com/convert-article-into-audio-podcast/
|
|
Gerry
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gerry on Oct 16, 2023 9:51:19 GMT
I think the option to collapse inter linear translations is a great idea, if I have put it on to listen to with a reader when I am out for a walk they get in the way and make it difficult to listen to.
The new update now includes a "Pun Config" widget in the upper-left corner where you can fold the interlinear glyphs & vocabulary away. If you set it to "Beginner", only the English translation remains. The grammar is a little off sometimes, due to the foreign languages having a different word order, but it should be usable with a screen reader.
This feature will hopefully also help many other people who were put off by the glyphs. On the other hand, people who are interested in glyphs can put the setting to "Expert", and can now see the glyphs even for Hebrew and Greek, where they weren't available before.
As for screen readers, if you know any HTML markup that helps with these things, or maybe a model example site on the internet where it works better, let me know.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 16, 2023 10:49:11 GMT
Gerry You sir are a gentleman and a genius. I doff my cap to you. I think that will help people immensely with getting a finger hold in the subject before going deeper. I have just now tried it in Bing (with its native reader) and it works amazingly well. I actually use a package called Text Aloud from a little developer called NextUp Technologies which is a copy to clipboard / select and speak type package and your site works fine with this. I am afraid I am not au fait with the HTML or accessibility mark-ups and therefore any site recommendation would just be the usual disability charities that never seem to be very good at anything detailed.
|
|
|
Post by Davey on Sept 17, 2024 15:26:56 GMT
Note to Gerry: Briliant takedown of Gerard Nordskoven over at the Haven. HIs posts have always made me uncomfortable. You put my intuition into words that I could not have found myself.
|
|
|
Post by erwin on Sept 17, 2024 17:16:35 GMT
Note to Gerry: Briliant takedown of Gerard Nordskoven over at the Haven. HIs posts have always made me uncomfortable. You put my intuition into words that I could not have found myself. Yeah. He/She was just polluting things over there. Even when I ignore these posts, there are just so many. Glad to see little of His/Her posts this september. Last one from the 6th.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Sept 21, 2024 10:44:42 GMT
I had forgotten about this thread. Totally agree about Gerard N Back on topic, Gerry do you have web stats. I do have a good few ideas. I think it is largely a marketing job to get your message out and to make your site more clear / navigable on what it contains. I end up having to use the search to find a lot of it, which is great once you know what your site is about but (I suspect) makes the initial retention of visitors hard. I would have the top articles listed and even a top ten trending list of articles. It would be interesting to address some of the points that lol has raised as these are probably the common questions for a sceptical reader. It could also be useful to make it more accessible, something like a brief history of punnery may be a good addition, working back from contemporary examples in English (and other languages) to show how it is still used and has always been used. This would help to show that there should be no surprise that it was used back in the day. This would also (to some extent) answer lol's question. It was used, whether these texts are still the texts that are used is unknown but they prove the coding. As troublesome as they are comments sections are a very good way of retaining visitors. You could also add all those share buttons to get out onto the dreaded socials. I would be most interested in texts that I already have some knowledge of as it is hard to relate to texts that I have no or little idea about and no idea how it flows and what the overt purpose or context was. Yep, I was barely educated. Regarding people still taking the texts at face value, I would agree that you probably aren't reaching a wide audience. I do think that there is an instinct to use the tools / knowledge that we have to hand to analyse problems and as you haven't done a full decryption of everything (obviously) and people don't know the decryptions as well as the text then they have a tendency to do very linear analysis. For example, I am a F1 fan and still have a tendency to think they are racing when it is very likely scripted reality. And, I still hoping Land can overturn that gap to Max! Therefore, and I am not sure how this would be achieved, it would be most useful to concentrate on popular texts (as you have done with the 10 Commandments) and people can see these for what they are. However, you have also stated that many of the texts you have analysed still have some value in their obvious meaning. So maybe taking them at face value does have it's place too. As a way of explaining the behaviour, were people can't stick to the point, It is one thing I hav notice both here and on the haven - that despite being of a Miles Mathis discussion board people seem more interested in discussing anything other than his actual works, which I find extremely annoying. Sorry for my rambling response, hope you can decrypt some meaning from it!
|
|