Post by lol on Mar 24, 2023 17:28:25 GMT
Two days ago (Wed.) I wrote a substack post at cataclysmicearthhistory.substack.com/p/mathis-advanced-ancient-civilization called MATHIS: ADVANCED ANCIENT CIVILIZATION, in which I copied a lot of Miles' theory from his recent Pyramids paper milesmathis.com/pyr2.pdf . I started though with an intro, where I mentioned Velikovsky's and Talbott's theories, which Miles critiqued in prior papers, and I stated that, while there may have been covert agents involved in their circles, I think it's unlikely that most of them were or are agents. Then, after presenting Miles' theory in detail, I commented on what I think of each element of his theory, giving a probability percentage for each element. Here are my comments.
MY COMMENTS ON MILES' PYRAMID THEORY
60% {EXPLOSIONS IN PYRAMIDS} This seems at least 60% probable, although I haven't heard much about such explosions in the Great Pyramid.
50% {CHARGE FIELD POWERED PYRAMIDS} This is plausible, but I haven't seen enough evidence for this to say it's probable. It does seem probable that ancient people used the pyramids for some kind of power or something practical, not just for religious purposes. Ancient Architects suggested that the Great Pyramid was a ram pump to water crops as rains became scarce and the Sahara started to expand. {I should have added that AA suggested that the pyramid as a ram pump didn't include the upper portion of the pyramid, which AA said was added by later pharaohs.}
40% {MODERN CONSPIRACY} I don't know of any evidence that oligarchs are {secretly} trying to {learn how to} extract energy or power from the pyramids.
30% {HEMISPHERIC POWER POTENTIAL} I don't know of evidence that pyramids can provide enough energy to power half of the Earth's present usage.
60% {ACCIDENTAL EXPLOSIONS} If there have been explosions in any of the pyramids, {I agree} it seems likely that they would have been accidents.
50% {IRREPARABLE} Miles' reasoning seems plausible, but I don't know enough to judge whether the pyramids are irreparable.
www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/060407cometasteroid.htm
60% {ASTEROID BELT ORIGIN} Mainstream science says the asteroid belt formed from the solar nebula, but the Nebular Hypothesis is very improbable. Talbott and colleagues suggest that a Saturn nova (or flare-up) or collisions between planets or moons formed the asteroid belt about 4,500 years ago. I think that has a greater probability. Charles Chandler has good scientific theory behind the formation of the Moon and Ceres etc at qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=6031 . However, he tends to place the formation much earlier, similar to Miles, or maybe even earlier than what Miles thinks.
40% {ALIEN COLONIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM} It's slightly plausible to me that humans inhabited other planets, especially since Mars and Venus were surely very close to Earth a few thousand years ago. If evidence of artifacts {is} ever found on the Moon or Mars, that would obviously raise the probability percentage to nearly 100%. I've seen images online that suggest there are such artifacts, but none have been very convincing so far. Richard Hoagland used to promote this theory.
30% {CRO-MAGNON ALIENS} I don't know of evidence that Cro-magnons were aliens. Their brain sizes are said to be larger than modern man, but that doesn't mean much alone.
10% {TITAN & VENUS COLONIES} It's unlikely that Titan & Venus were ever habitable. Venus may be a new planet, which would account for its high heat. Titan may be fairly new too, which might account for its thick atmosphere, thicker than Earth's.
10% {PYRAMID LUNAR POWER} I don't know of evidence that power could be derived from the Moon's relationship to Earth in any way.
70% {VENUS ENCOUNTER} The Saturn Theory seems likely to be correct, that Mars, Venus and Saturn were close to the Earth about 4,500 years ago and that Mars and Venus made close catastrophic encounters with the Earth before settling in their present orbits. Miles supposes that the light from the Sun has enough force to prevent large bodies from getting close to the Sun, but the fact that comets regularly go very close to the Sun, or even collide with it, suggests to me that his supposition is wrong. He and Charles Chandler have theories to explain the Titius-Bode law that notes the distances between the planets. Miles thinks EM radiation (like light) is emitted by the planets which repels them from each other. Miles calls this EM radiation the charge field, which he says also powered pyramids. Charles supposed that the planets have the same electric charge which repels them apart. Electric charge is from protons and electrons.
creation.com/the-way-it-really-is-little-known-facts-about-radiometric-dating
10% {DATING} Miles says the Venus encounter with Earth occurred many thousands of years ago, which would mean that the pyramid builders lived many thousands of years ago. Graham Hancock and others share the belief that there was ancient civilization many thousands of years ago. Even Saturn theorists tend to think that sedimentary rock strata were deposited gradually over millions of years. But they're all wrong. The Great Flood occurred probably about 5,300 years ago and all of the sedimentary strata were deposited during and partly after the Great Flood. The pyramids are all built upon sedimentary rock strata, so they were built after the Flood. Some of the evidence for the time of the Flood includes that the oldest tree is about 4,700 years old and that continental granite dates to under 8,000 years old. The reason most of the sediments must have been deposited all at once (over a few months time) is that there is very little erosion between sedimentary layers, there is very little bioturbation (whereby animals burrow into the top of sediments), and the sediments are sorted into sandstone, mudstone (shale), and limestone, which sorting can only occur in major Flooding. I wrote about this at cataclysmicearthhistory.substack.com/p/1 .
30% {EXPLOIT PYRAMIDS} I doubt if the pyramids can provide enough power to pay for the cost of repairing them, but I'm willing to change my mind if I see good evidence.
MY COMMENTS ON MILES' PYRAMID THEORY
60% {EXPLOSIONS IN PYRAMIDS} This seems at least 60% probable, although I haven't heard much about such explosions in the Great Pyramid.
50% {CHARGE FIELD POWERED PYRAMIDS} This is plausible, but I haven't seen enough evidence for this to say it's probable. It does seem probable that ancient people used the pyramids for some kind of power or something practical, not just for religious purposes. Ancient Architects suggested that the Great Pyramid was a ram pump to water crops as rains became scarce and the Sahara started to expand. {I should have added that AA suggested that the pyramid as a ram pump didn't include the upper portion of the pyramid, which AA said was added by later pharaohs.}
40% {MODERN CONSPIRACY} I don't know of any evidence that oligarchs are {secretly} trying to {learn how to} extract energy or power from the pyramids.
30% {HEMISPHERIC POWER POTENTIAL} I don't know of evidence that pyramids can provide enough energy to power half of the Earth's present usage.
60% {ACCIDENTAL EXPLOSIONS} If there have been explosions in any of the pyramids, {I agree} it seems likely that they would have been accidents.
50% {IRREPARABLE} Miles' reasoning seems plausible, but I don't know enough to judge whether the pyramids are irreparable.
www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/060407cometasteroid.htm
60% {ASTEROID BELT ORIGIN} Mainstream science says the asteroid belt formed from the solar nebula, but the Nebular Hypothesis is very improbable. Talbott and colleagues suggest that a Saturn nova (or flare-up) or collisions between planets or moons formed the asteroid belt about 4,500 years ago. I think that has a greater probability. Charles Chandler has good scientific theory behind the formation of the Moon and Ceres etc at qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=6031 . However, he tends to place the formation much earlier, similar to Miles, or maybe even earlier than what Miles thinks.
40% {ALIEN COLONIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM} It's slightly plausible to me that humans inhabited other planets, especially since Mars and Venus were surely very close to Earth a few thousand years ago. If evidence of artifacts {is} ever found on the Moon or Mars, that would obviously raise the probability percentage to nearly 100%. I've seen images online that suggest there are such artifacts, but none have been very convincing so far. Richard Hoagland used to promote this theory.
30% {CRO-MAGNON ALIENS} I don't know of evidence that Cro-magnons were aliens. Their brain sizes are said to be larger than modern man, but that doesn't mean much alone.
10% {TITAN & VENUS COLONIES} It's unlikely that Titan & Venus were ever habitable. Venus may be a new planet, which would account for its high heat. Titan may be fairly new too, which might account for its thick atmosphere, thicker than Earth's.
10% {PYRAMID LUNAR POWER} I don't know of evidence that power could be derived from the Moon's relationship to Earth in any way.
70% {VENUS ENCOUNTER} The Saturn Theory seems likely to be correct, that Mars, Venus and Saturn were close to the Earth about 4,500 years ago and that Mars and Venus made close catastrophic encounters with the Earth before settling in their present orbits. Miles supposes that the light from the Sun has enough force to prevent large bodies from getting close to the Sun, but the fact that comets regularly go very close to the Sun, or even collide with it, suggests to me that his supposition is wrong. He and Charles Chandler have theories to explain the Titius-Bode law that notes the distances between the planets. Miles thinks EM radiation (like light) is emitted by the planets which repels them from each other. Miles calls this EM radiation the charge field, which he says also powered pyramids. Charles supposed that the planets have the same electric charge which repels them apart. Electric charge is from protons and electrons.
creation.com/the-way-it-really-is-little-known-facts-about-radiometric-dating
10% {DATING} Miles says the Venus encounter with Earth occurred many thousands of years ago, which would mean that the pyramid builders lived many thousands of years ago. Graham Hancock and others share the belief that there was ancient civilization many thousands of years ago. Even Saturn theorists tend to think that sedimentary rock strata were deposited gradually over millions of years. But they're all wrong. The Great Flood occurred probably about 5,300 years ago and all of the sedimentary strata were deposited during and partly after the Great Flood. The pyramids are all built upon sedimentary rock strata, so they were built after the Flood. Some of the evidence for the time of the Flood includes that the oldest tree is about 4,700 years old and that continental granite dates to under 8,000 years old. The reason most of the sediments must have been deposited all at once (over a few months time) is that there is very little erosion between sedimentary layers, there is very little bioturbation (whereby animals burrow into the top of sediments), and the sediments are sorted into sandstone, mudstone (shale), and limestone, which sorting can only occur in major Flooding. I wrote about this at cataclysmicearthhistory.substack.com/p/1 .
30% {EXPLOIT PYRAMIDS} I doubt if the pyramids can provide enough power to pay for the cost of repairing them, but I'm willing to change my mind if I see good evidence.