Post by Michael on Feb 11, 2024 12:47:10 GMT
Yesterday I got booted from mathaisiannhaven, I was surprised, it has started me questioning my naivety and a few other things. I can't really decided whether it is my humour or my asking questions that got me booted.
A. Did anyone see that?
B. Was I out of order?
C. Has anyone got any views.
D. He already did you jackass troll, to the spam you go henceforth. Can anyone show me where Miles has defended himself on this matter?
Transcript follows:
Lewis reid Avatar
Lewis reid
February 8, 2024 at 6:54 am
New paper ‘Darwin’:
Click to access darwin.pdf
Like
Reply
Maria Avatar
Maria
February 9, 2024 at 4:28 am
Oh my God. Another one bits the dust. Darwin is a fraud. But why? If there were other scientists coming up with the same theories around the same time, why weren’t they allowed or willing to publish their work? Were they all bought out or buried? Or are Darwin’s theories themselves fraudulent, perhaps created as opposition to Christianity?
Liked by 1 person
Reply
Gerard Nordskoven Avatar
Gerard Nordskoven
February 9, 2024 at 9:33 am
Correspondence between Lawyer Lyell and Gentleman Collector Darwin expressed the need to annihilate Moses’ creation account. Project needed a steady-state unchanging “Laboratory Earth” model so real scientist and the Father of Paleontology, Georges Cuvier, with his catastrophism (upheaval, not stasis) model was cancelled. Only Miles W. Mathis could shatter the Playboy of Tenerife. Conniving “consensus” academics festering in places like McGill U. in Canada and Brigham Young U. in the USA make quick work of truthsayer renegades. +
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 9, 2024 at 8:46 pm
Co-pilots TLDR, what do you reckon? I haven’t had time to read the paper yet.
The author reveals that Darwin came from a very wealthy and influential family, with connections to the top nobility and the East India Company. He also shows that Darwin was a Unitarian, a sect that aimed to undermine Christianity and promote humanism and statism.
The author questions the authenticity and credibility of Darwin’s education, voyages, and discoveries, pointing out many inconsistencies, contradictions, and improbabilities in his biography and journals. He suggests that Darwin was a frontman for a larger project of social engineering by the Phoenician elite.
A bum to the right: The author analyzes a cartoon that allegedly depicts Darwin and his crew on the Beagle, and finds it full of absurdities and inconsistencies. He suggests that the cartoon is not what it claims to be, but rather a piece of propaganda to support the Beagle story.
Darwin’s notes and drawings: The author criticizes Darwin’s lack of detail and originality in his notes and drawings, and compares them unfavorably to his own work on the ammonia molecule. He implies that Darwin was not a genuine naturalist, but a fraud who relied on others’ work and discoveries.
Darwin’s fame and illness: The author questions why Darwin was so celebrated and promoted by the scientific establishment, while other naturalists were ignored or neglected1. He speculates that Darwin was a project of the Dukes and the Treasury, and that his illness was caused by the stress of being feted for a fraud.
Darwin’s marriage and romance: The author mocks Darwin’s pros and cons list for marriage, and compares him to Ross from Friends. He doubts that Darwin’s wife ever read his list, which compared her to a dog2.
1. Page 21 – Line 212. Page 22 – Line 10
Like
Reply
Barbara Franken Avatar
Barbara Franken
February 10, 2024 at 4:57 pm
Michael…. What are you on? Your last few posts seem to be showing you’re going through a bit of a transmutation… Have you been on a trip to amsterdam and found the magic mushrooms? Take a deep breath and relax, we’re all on the same side here❤️
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 9, 2024 at 9:13 pm
BTW, LEWIS = LEMIS = SMILE or could it be a name that I can’t quite get to. so, how much of a leap is it to say that Lewis is Miles. It wasn’t the name that tipped me off by the way, it was the speed and brevity of the posting “new paper.”
BTW2, does that mean that Miles is really a Lewis? Hmmm, now wouldn’t that be a thing. That would be three surnames LEWIS (C S Lewis, Lewis Hamilton, Lewis Carroll, WILLIAMS (Cani’t thing of any beyond Andy Williams, Venus & Serena Williams, Frank Williams of Williams F1 Team, oh well) and A SMITH (Smith’ Bank).
Mind you Miles is also a surname from the Latin name Milo, and we know who those curlied haired buggers really are. Oh well, at least Miles does have curly hair…….
Of course, non of this would stand up in court, but I see things sometimes and don’t see why I shouldn’t say them.
All just light hearted speculation, but that doesn’t mean I am wrong.
Like
Reply
Swathy Krishna Avatar
Swathy Krishna
February 9, 2024 at 11:15 pm
Dude, what is this? Usually you post sensible stuff.
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 9, 2024 at 11:52 pm
@swathy Which bit. The linking of names is a parody, I am fully aware that names are not enough, they a good jumping off point that can start looking like very strong evidence – hence the joke. I did include: All just light hearted speculation, but that doesn’t mean I am wrong.
and : Oh well, at least Miles does have curly hair……. which would suggest the rest was not accurate, though I stand by the “Lewis” anagram work, Mathis to A Smith seems that tnsy winsiest bit far-fetched to me (tinsy winsiest bit is a reference to Blackadder II). Though to be fair that was a typo and I was going to say that Miles doesn’t have curly hair – boy, am I glad I didn’t do that!
As for Lewis being Miles I am reasonably confident of that one, like 65% chance, for the reasons I have stated. I was only slightly worried about pointing it out, but then thought that Miles is really rather keen on speaking the truth as he sees it, so, I should be too.
Like
Swathy Krishna Avatar
Swathy Krishna
February 10, 2024 at 6:12 am
Seeing as neither children nor aliens likely find your parody funny, I’m wondering who it was aimed at. You have to show genealogical ties plus links by association to show that someone is Jewish. Seeing as you did neither, where did you get the 65% chance from? Maybe that’s a typo and you meant 88%? Plus I’m pretty sure not many guys with curly blind hair are gonna have the name Lewis.
Like
Lewis reid Avatar
Lewis reid
February 10, 2024 at 2:01 am
Michael you are 100% wrong. I’m Scottish with Irish on my ma’s side, and live in ol’ blighty. You’ve obviously been taking too many drugs or you’ve lost your Langley instructions.
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 10, 2024 at 5:58 pm
@swathy, pretty sure it wasn’t aimed at children or aliens. It was aimed at intelligent, open minded adults with a sense of humour. I am old enough to know that I am actually a very funny guy, so I really don’t give two f’s whether you think I am funny or not.
@lwis Langley, brilliant, for that I truly hope you ain’t Miles.
Miles is a big boy, he can defend himself if he wants, he doesn’t need a gang doing it for him. If he is offended do you not think he would have posted?
Like
Swathy Krishna Avatar
Swathy Krishna
February 10, 2024 at 9:01 pm
He already did you jackass troll, to the spam you go henceforth.
A. Did anyone see that?
B. Was I out of order?
C. Has anyone got any views.
D. He already did you jackass troll, to the spam you go henceforth. Can anyone show me where Miles has defended himself on this matter?
Transcript follows:
Lewis reid Avatar
Lewis reid
February 8, 2024 at 6:54 am
New paper ‘Darwin’:
Click to access darwin.pdf
Like
Reply
Maria Avatar
Maria
February 9, 2024 at 4:28 am
Oh my God. Another one bits the dust. Darwin is a fraud. But why? If there were other scientists coming up with the same theories around the same time, why weren’t they allowed or willing to publish their work? Were they all bought out or buried? Or are Darwin’s theories themselves fraudulent, perhaps created as opposition to Christianity?
Liked by 1 person
Reply
Gerard Nordskoven Avatar
Gerard Nordskoven
February 9, 2024 at 9:33 am
Correspondence between Lawyer Lyell and Gentleman Collector Darwin expressed the need to annihilate Moses’ creation account. Project needed a steady-state unchanging “Laboratory Earth” model so real scientist and the Father of Paleontology, Georges Cuvier, with his catastrophism (upheaval, not stasis) model was cancelled. Only Miles W. Mathis could shatter the Playboy of Tenerife. Conniving “consensus” academics festering in places like McGill U. in Canada and Brigham Young U. in the USA make quick work of truthsayer renegades. +
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 9, 2024 at 8:46 pm
Co-pilots TLDR, what do you reckon? I haven’t had time to read the paper yet.
The author reveals that Darwin came from a very wealthy and influential family, with connections to the top nobility and the East India Company. He also shows that Darwin was a Unitarian, a sect that aimed to undermine Christianity and promote humanism and statism.
The author questions the authenticity and credibility of Darwin’s education, voyages, and discoveries, pointing out many inconsistencies, contradictions, and improbabilities in his biography and journals. He suggests that Darwin was a frontman for a larger project of social engineering by the Phoenician elite.
A bum to the right: The author analyzes a cartoon that allegedly depicts Darwin and his crew on the Beagle, and finds it full of absurdities and inconsistencies. He suggests that the cartoon is not what it claims to be, but rather a piece of propaganda to support the Beagle story.
Darwin’s notes and drawings: The author criticizes Darwin’s lack of detail and originality in his notes and drawings, and compares them unfavorably to his own work on the ammonia molecule. He implies that Darwin was not a genuine naturalist, but a fraud who relied on others’ work and discoveries.
Darwin’s fame and illness: The author questions why Darwin was so celebrated and promoted by the scientific establishment, while other naturalists were ignored or neglected1. He speculates that Darwin was a project of the Dukes and the Treasury, and that his illness was caused by the stress of being feted for a fraud.
Darwin’s marriage and romance: The author mocks Darwin’s pros and cons list for marriage, and compares him to Ross from Friends. He doubts that Darwin’s wife ever read his list, which compared her to a dog2.
1. Page 21 – Line 212. Page 22 – Line 10
Like
Reply
Barbara Franken Avatar
Barbara Franken
February 10, 2024 at 4:57 pm
Michael…. What are you on? Your last few posts seem to be showing you’re going through a bit of a transmutation… Have you been on a trip to amsterdam and found the magic mushrooms? Take a deep breath and relax, we’re all on the same side here❤️
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 9, 2024 at 9:13 pm
BTW, LEWIS = LEMIS = SMILE or could it be a name that I can’t quite get to. so, how much of a leap is it to say that Lewis is Miles. It wasn’t the name that tipped me off by the way, it was the speed and brevity of the posting “new paper.”
BTW2, does that mean that Miles is really a Lewis? Hmmm, now wouldn’t that be a thing. That would be three surnames LEWIS (C S Lewis, Lewis Hamilton, Lewis Carroll, WILLIAMS (Cani’t thing of any beyond Andy Williams, Venus & Serena Williams, Frank Williams of Williams F1 Team, oh well) and A SMITH (Smith’ Bank).
Mind you Miles is also a surname from the Latin name Milo, and we know who those curlied haired buggers really are. Oh well, at least Miles does have curly hair…….
Of course, non of this would stand up in court, but I see things sometimes and don’t see why I shouldn’t say them.
All just light hearted speculation, but that doesn’t mean I am wrong.
Like
Reply
Swathy Krishna Avatar
Swathy Krishna
February 9, 2024 at 11:15 pm
Dude, what is this? Usually you post sensible stuff.
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 9, 2024 at 11:52 pm
@swathy Which bit. The linking of names is a parody, I am fully aware that names are not enough, they a good jumping off point that can start looking like very strong evidence – hence the joke. I did include: All just light hearted speculation, but that doesn’t mean I am wrong.
and : Oh well, at least Miles does have curly hair……. which would suggest the rest was not accurate, though I stand by the “Lewis” anagram work, Mathis to A Smith seems that tnsy winsiest bit far-fetched to me (tinsy winsiest bit is a reference to Blackadder II). Though to be fair that was a typo and I was going to say that Miles doesn’t have curly hair – boy, am I glad I didn’t do that!
As for Lewis being Miles I am reasonably confident of that one, like 65% chance, for the reasons I have stated. I was only slightly worried about pointing it out, but then thought that Miles is really rather keen on speaking the truth as he sees it, so, I should be too.
Like
Swathy Krishna Avatar
Swathy Krishna
February 10, 2024 at 6:12 am
Seeing as neither children nor aliens likely find your parody funny, I’m wondering who it was aimed at. You have to show genealogical ties plus links by association to show that someone is Jewish. Seeing as you did neither, where did you get the 65% chance from? Maybe that’s a typo and you meant 88%? Plus I’m pretty sure not many guys with curly blind hair are gonna have the name Lewis.
Like
Lewis reid Avatar
Lewis reid
February 10, 2024 at 2:01 am
Michael you are 100% wrong. I’m Scottish with Irish on my ma’s side, and live in ol’ blighty. You’ve obviously been taking too many drugs or you’ve lost your Langley instructions.
Like
Michael Avatar
Michael
February 10, 2024 at 5:58 pm
@swathy, pretty sure it wasn’t aimed at children or aliens. It was aimed at intelligent, open minded adults with a sense of humour. I am old enough to know that I am actually a very funny guy, so I really don’t give two f’s whether you think I am funny or not.
@lwis Langley, brilliant, for that I truly hope you ain’t Miles.
Miles is a big boy, he can defend himself if he wants, he doesn’t need a gang doing it for him. If he is offended do you not think he would have posted?
Like
Swathy Krishna Avatar
Swathy Krishna
February 10, 2024 at 9:01 pm
He already did you jackass troll, to the spam you go henceforth.
