sark
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 1
|
Post by sark on Feb 27, 2023 8:06:35 GMT
Here's a flash for what looks like Doorman's parrot here: "hypocrites" can be "sarcastic" too, you know. You're welcome, don't mention it ;-)...since they seem to appreciate a particular type of sarcasm. BTW is the Mahler's Muse on indefinite vacation leave, or retired(?) based on the increasing lack of inspiration on the Mahler forums' show these days, plus the fact that the 'Current Events Discussion Thread' turned out to be a "Rehash & Jumble Sale" Thread now. But no worry, Team Josh & Miles have been "cleaning up the place" : cuttingthroughthefog.com/2018/11/09/current-events-discussion-thread/comment-page-176/#comment-228599And cuttingthroughthefog.com/2018/11/09/current-events-discussion-thread/comment-page-175/#comment-228219Has anyone seen much "self-patterning on Maria" since zee order was given to zee CTTF (huge) crowds? The Mahler's Muse came up with the well-known fraud Tucker bleeding Carlson...again, oh yeah! May I suggest more Bra-t- Pitt mentions as well, and I'm sure the zillions of readers and kitty donors out there also can't wait for another paper bashing the well-known stinky mainstream and controlled op/politico-show-business-puppets-and props we poor peasant readers have never-ever heard of. Always prioritizing quantity over quality sure is simply genious. GO Mahler; I love Big Mahler!
My question to you is: is that still true that nothing is censored so far, on this site?...
Good thing that people with intellectual honesty can recognize and call out bullshit when they see it, with or without (silent) censorship.
|
|
doormanthe3rd
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 60
|
Post by doormanthe3rd on Feb 27, 2023 23:36:19 GMT
sark seems to be dtox. I note the use of "flash" which was used as "flash news" to me on the second page. Also there is another example of Brad Pitt mentioned like dtox did on page two.
|
|
ska
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 93
|
Post by ska on Feb 28, 2023 9:28:10 GMT
He seems to be pretty bitter. Maybe Miles snubbed him. Miles isn't looking for chatty friends, obviously. He's too busy writing papers. Maybe Miles has an ego or maybe he just despises idle words. Sometimes it helps to ask questions of Miles if you think that there's a controversy.
I think that this thread SHOULD be left to rot, otherwise it just encourages the butt-hurt {Dent's reference} to come out of the woodwork and foam out their complaints. After all, we're only here/got to where we are because of Miles. If Miles, being of a genius mind, was as big-headed as you've painted him then why does he yearn to enlighten the plebs. To me he is a genius: He's pulled off math, research, and at the same time, has done foundation work {for cats}. You have to be selfless to do what he's done for free. If he seems to be inquisitive or thinks what you've done is questionable why not just have a humble attitude and acknowledge your mistake/mistakes? Or, have a discussion about it WITH HIM??
|
|
doormanthe3rd
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 60
|
Post by doormanthe3rd on Feb 28, 2023 22:00:06 GMT
TDM is the thirdDoorMan? Perhaps its a language thing, but much of what you write is really difficult to interpret. I guess that is the tough bear meat idea? Why bother then, its just another way to avoid being direct and explicit in what you say, in my view, you don't "get it" as you like to repeat. Switching the topic to seismic waves and spin in mechanical fields, ok, whatever, literally nine different ways to interpret what you are saying and so specific meaning is sort of smeared out and lost. More time is spent trying to understand your text You think I can't process your tough bear meat? Here is a short one, Tony didn't present his ideas, he says Miles' ideas, his paper [unspecified] _reminded_ him of a star trek episode where fantastic fiction can slot in for the moral of knowing who the real enemy is. So beware the mind control telling us to fight our fellow men? Seems I'm a bit more concise. And for a highlight we have Graham down page "Nice we can all have rational chats here again after recent purges, even when there isn’t a consensus. " If only Graham knew rationality was purged in favor of "nice chats". I'm sure these people are turning away from reality, but to NULL? nah. Remember I had three people stick up for my non-spookdom, it never occured to them I could just change what I present at CTTF to suit thier taste [or josh's] I made an honest effort until it was clear I was being abused. I took a long break from even lurking after this "nice chat" from Jared cuttingthroughthefog.com/2018/11/09/current-events-discussion-thread/comment-page-135/#comment-172957 Can you follow the technical discussion here Primitive Grunt? Have I spent too much time writing this? How much time do you think was spent?
|
|
joey
Bot till proven otherwise
Posts: 36
|
Post by joey on Mar 4, 2023 2:35:33 GMT
Hmm where is this thing going lol?
|
|
|
Post by Daniel Archer on Mar 4, 2023 8:14:58 GMT
Hmm where is this thing going lol? Nowhere :-)
|
|
doormanthe3rd
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 60
|
Post by doormanthe3rd on Mar 4, 2023 21:07:12 GMT
Both of you are trying to say something?
|
|
ska
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 93
|
Post by ska on Mar 5, 2023 9:56:31 GMT
By the way, the word "cult" comes from the word "culture" which has to do with cultivating something. It's why a new group of Christian believers are sometimes referred to as a "cult" in that they're trying to cultivate the truth as they understand it. So yeah, hopefully CTTF has a culture thing going on.
|
|
doormanthe3rd
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 60
|
Post by doormanthe3rd on Mar 5, 2023 21:43:38 GMT
The culture is completely full of bullshit on a regular basis though, even utterances from Miles. I guess culturally thats not worth discussing and we should politely ignore it. Look at the quote I posted from Graham, talking about recent purges that now support "rational chats", do you think that is true or refelective of a culture that values truth? Who even was purged recently? Do we have a list? . . . . . . .crickets. . . . . . . . deletion of content for unspecified reasons . . . . . . . . . . oh this is all going nowhere. . . . . . . . . . . about that word cult, did you know???
"There are others who come here whose main goal seems to bait me and push my buttons, hoping they can drive me and other sensible people off. They have almost succeeded in destroying this opportunity, but Josh is back now and we aren’t going to let them."
Who are these people? He can name Schwarzenegger as relative of hitler but he can't name some forum posters [plural] like this? People are STILL complaining about forum auto-mod to the point of GIVING UP on trying to contribute, josh being away isn't even touched on as a way people were off put from CTTF. Mmmm.
|
|
ska
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 93
|
Post by ska on Mar 6, 2023 21:23:45 GMT
Please help me understand: This is supposed to be a Miles Mathis forum, right? Or is it a Bashing Miles Mathis Forum? This is all under the heading: "Miles is a jerk and CTTF is off putting". I mean, he's even less likely to want to visit now, don't you think?? You guys are making this all about you. If this had happened to anybody else, would they be going on and on and on and on ad infinitum {Mr Kinder is a good example of not doing that}?? You keep bringing up "Jared". Jared this and Jared that. But Jared was a huge contributor. I truly miss the guy, even though he would seem condescending if he was answering someone directly. So, he had a disagreement with Rolleikin. So what? I don't hear him complaining. Two gifted guys going at it. If you were to ask Rolleikin he would probably laugh. Yes, as hard as this is for you to grasp, Jared was like the life of the party. He made us all laugh, continually. Take Rolleikin for example: Since we haven't heard from Jared he hasn't brought up even one tiny grievance. Why is that?
You, on the other hand clog things up. You can't seem to learn to go along to get along. But I don't think that you'll ever get to that place which is most unfortunate because you seem to have a lot going for you. You guys remind me of a couple of whispering old ladies off in the corner.
If you guys want Miles to contribute you're gonna need to have a different approach. If Miles never shows up I couldn't blame him, though. It would be nice if he would try to, even to the point of addressing some of YOUR grievances. But would it resolve anything?? Or would he just be wasting his time??
|
|
ska
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 93
|
Post by ska on Mar 6, 2023 22:04:11 GMT
By the way, thank you for the link to the discourse that you had with Jared about TEM or SEM about dna holding up under microscopy. I think that it was a good question to begin with. Sorry that I seemed to be taking his side. I can seem to be a sycophant at times but that doesn't mean that I am one. But I'm glad that you guys explored the question. You were wising up a dummy.
|
|
doormanthe3rd
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 60
|
Post by doormanthe3rd on Mar 6, 2023 22:39:34 GMT
I guess when you say someone keeps bringing up Jared, thats referring to me, when you mention "you guys" I guess you are talking about a group. I'm glad to bring up the discourse I had with Jared, and I never considered crticizing him for not contributing, that is absurd. He can be the life of the party, he can entertain, what you seem to think I'm having trouble grasping has been clear to me from the start. Jared has also met MM, has a long interaction, has laboriously built 3d animations of Miles' theories, which are still posted and are useful and fascinating, and collabed with other collaborators of MM, that I can detect at least as an outsider. He is a member in good standing.
So you are wrong, I did grasp that, you failed to grasp that I grasped that.
Again, my laboriously elaborated point, What he was saying about TEM SEM was bullshit, in one very specific case, but it was a key tenet of his refutation of corona virus existence. What I attempted was to say this tenet made little sense, could be falsified, WAS FALSIIED by using science papers he himself posted links to. he had said "it" before, and I had been wanting to counter his notion. i WAS NEW, I AM A SPOOK UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE OR SOME OTHER CULTURE bs. You say "you guys EXPLORED the question" but that is NOT THE CASE.
So you are wrong again SKA. A delusion you are suffering from perhaps, look again at that convo. Abuse from the very first moment I challenged his idea. He doesn't just SEEM condescending, he is using ad homs and all these spook tactics which happen to be sternly warned against by the forum spooks thread which you never read carefully I'm guessing. I emailed Josh about my issues at that time.
Sorry SKA, but it really seems difficult to penetrate your understanding here. Its like you can't see [your friend or a life of the party] slap me across the face. The issue is not my face hurts or I'm humiliated or embarrassed, I don't even care about being excluded from the group or losing some political popularity contest. the issue is that it happened and why is anyone putting up with this kind of abusive behavior? I LEFT CTTF. what is so hard to parse here SKA? That is YOUR CULTURE at CTTF, that is just a fact of that time and place.
Some want to talk about butt hurt, you SKA want to talk about bashing Miles Mathis and how we should shape our behavior to be more inviting. I want to talk about how you and almost every single person in the CTTF and this community seems timid, seems to be playing a wait and see game, or a political form of silence and evade and move on, when there is literally an elephant shitting on the stage in front of us all. Its not surprising, its human to avoid conflict and to get into political popularity games. Congradulations! You are human, and I am too, now apply the same scrutiny to the Phoenicians, they are trapped in these human popularity games as well.
Now apply it to Miles, who I quoted, and you danced around, what people were pushing his buttons, trying to chase him and others off, trying to destroy CTTF's bridge between MM and his readers? Answer the question SKA or I'm sorry, you were not paying attention close enough to catch it.
It wasn't me, not anyone I can detect, but I'm willing to name names, one of them is JARED. He is not perfect, this is just truth, I have no interest in him leaving CTTF or otherwise staying away from commenting. I want him to OWN his bullshit and stop slapping people who just happen disagree with him, thats all, really that is my whole intent with that guy. I could say a similiar thing about Miles or Josh, they need to take responsibility for thier actions or its all just a political game that looks more and more phonecian. THATS THE CUTURE, and it continues throuh Joey's opinionating, in my SKATE thread, and I did it on CTTF within thier published rules. This is just a fact, its not MY truth, I have given some effort to provide evidence.
|
|
|
Post by Daniel Archer on Mar 7, 2023 7:38:38 GMT
Yep, it is all good here, no cencorship, i did ban 2 bots, the posts they make look like AI ramblings, just random stuff that makes no sense in the end. ( milesmathis.freeforums.net/thread/78/bans-deleted-posts ) Miles not joining is not insulting, i share his thoughts about this.
|
|
ska
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 93
|
Post by ska on Mar 7, 2023 16:51:10 GMT
@ doormanthe3rd, Or maybe the reason Jared's premise is wrong is because viruses aren't the cause of XYZ in the first place. As Miles has pointed out it's okay to speculate all day about who shot Kennedy rather than the truth. Remember how that someone posted on CTTF that a doctor, in 1895, figured out that it was a bacterium which was the likely culprit for the flu because he detected it in everyone's lungs who were sick. Enter, then, the Rockefeller's who high-jacked the narrative using something that you can't see. So, in reality, you're both wrong.
|
|
ska
Might not be a bot, but we still don’t trust him or her
Posts: 93
|
Post by ska on Mar 7, 2023 17:14:00 GMT
@ doormanthe3rd, Maybe that exchange between Miles and t0'clock is a good example where it got heated but then Miles changed the subject and moved on. Did t0'clock get banned? No. Miles would rather move on than have the well known exercise in futility. We'll never know because whatever seemingly point of contention that was raised died and that was the end of it. So please don't revisit the whole thing. I was just pointing it out as an example.
|
|